Kennedy proved it, Reagan proved it and so has Bush...tax cuts improve and grow the economy which provides more jobs for the middle class and increases revenue to the IRS...

when reports come out saying the "costs" of tax cuts, they are calculating the "lost revenue" to the IRS by using old rates and what the revenue would have been.. the problem with that is that these growth numbers would never had happened had the cuts not been put in place.... skewed logic....

so...why would we want to repeal Bush's tax cuts when jobs are more abundant and revenues to the treasury are up?

for the dems, I can understand why...a robust economy gives people more independence and makes them self sufficient.... dems depend on people needing them as opposed to the people being able to take care of themselves...

face it..if want Bush's tax cuts repealed...you just can't stand people getting any richer... you can not get over your hatred for those who have accomplished more than you and you could care less about jobs for the average person as long as those "evil rich" are taking it on the chin...